In a recent development, the Supreme Court has adjourned the hearing on Udhayanidhi Stalin's plea seeking the clubbing of multiple FIRs filed against him in various states over his controversial remarks. The bench, while expressing concern, questioned Stalin's decision to exercise Article 32 directly, reminding him of the consequences as a minister.
The matter stems from a petition filed by B Jagannath in September 2023, seeking the filing of an FIR against Stalin and his supporters for remarks equated to hate speech. Stalin, in turn, moved the apex court, requesting the consolidation of multiple FIRs from different states.
Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, representing Stalin, clarified that they were not defending the remarks but seeking consolidation. However, the Supreme Court directed them to approach the respective high courts for further action.
Udhayanidhi Stalin's comments against Sanatana Dharma had sparked nationwide controversy, as he compared it to a disease, leading to accusations of inciting genocide. In his defense, Stalin asserted that uprooting Sanatan Dharma is a stand for humanity and human equality, refuting claims of calling for genocide.
The Supreme Court has scheduled the plea for the next hearing on March 15, emphasizing the legal process to be followed in addressing the concerns raised by Stalin.